рус eng
«THE BULLETIN OF IRKUTSK STATE UNIVERSITY». SERIES «MATHEMATICS»
«IZVESTIYA IRKUTSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA». SERIYA «MATEMATIKA»
ISSN 1997-7670 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8785 (Online)

List of issues > Series «Mathematics». 2024. Vol 50

ESG Rating Employing NLP and Multi-Criteria Ranking Techniques for Russian Corporations

Author(s)
Leonid A. Mylnikov1, Maksim A. Storchevoy1, Vera V. Lapina1, Anastasia A. Murach1

1HSE University, Saint Petersburg, Perm, Russian Federation

Abstract
The significance of the research outlined here lies in the challenge of selecting partner companies under tight timeframes and with limited access to comprehensive data, particularly concerning a wide range of ethics and sustainability issues. This study aims to address this challenge by developing a model for the automated processing and analysis of textual information concerning groups of companies, particularly within the context of the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) concept. The study incorporates methods for automatically extracting topics from textual data, utilizing machine learning techniques, conducting multi-criteria ranking, and employing both comparative and expert analyses of the results. To conduct our experiments, we compiled a dataset comprising over 1200 reports from leading Russian companies spanning the years 2019 to 2022. Additionally, we leveraged news articles posted on the FORBES-Russia website. As a result of our work, we have developed a model and methodology for analyzing textual information about groups of companies, facilitating their ranking. The analysis of the obtained results, both qualitatively and quantitatively, demonstrates their non-random and justified nature.The study showcases the efficacy of the proposed model in selecting companies through the ranking of a limited set of candidates based on accessible textual information. The insights from this research are valuable not only for rating agencies but also for companies seeking to conduct their own analysis when choosing partners.
About the Authors

Leonid A. Mylnikov, Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Assoc. Prof., HSE University, Perm, 614070, Russian Federation, lamylnikov@hse.ru

Maksim A. Storchevoy, Cand. Sci. (Econom.), Assoc. Prof., HSE University, Saint Petersburg, 194100, Russian Federation, mstorchevoy@hse.ru

Vera V. Lapina, HSE University, Saint Petersburg, 194100, Russian Federation, vvlapina@hse.ru

Anastasia A. Murach, HSE University, Saint Petersburg, 194100, Russian Federation, amurach@hse.ru

For citation

Mylnikov L. A., Storchevoy M. A., Lapina V. V., Murach A.A. ESG Rating Employing NLP and Multi-Criteria Ranking Techniques for Russian Corporations. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 2024, vol. 50, pp. 125–142. (in Russian)

https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2024.50.125

Keywords
ESG, rating, ranking, natural language processing (NLP), model, company reports, Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT), topic extraction, word dictionary, feature matrix
UDC
519.7
MSC
68U15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2024.50.125
References
  1. Kazakov A., Denisova S., Barsola I., Kalugina E., Molchanova I., Egorov I., Kosterina A., Tereshchenko E., Shutikhina L., Doroshchenko I., Sotiriadi N., Budennyy S. ESGify: Automated Classification of Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance Risks. Doklady Mathematics, 2023, vol. 108, pp. S529–S540. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064562423701673
  2. Aiba Y., Ito T., Ibe Y. Network Structure in ESG Ratings Suggests New Corporate Strategies: Evolving AI Technology to Quantify Qualitative Data. Security Analysts Journal, 2020, vol. 16, pp. 3–15.
  3. Angelov D. Top2Vec: Distributed Representations of Topics. 2020. http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.09470
  4. Cheng T.-T., Tsai Y.-H., Lai Ch., Hwang S.-Y. Mining Impacts of CSR Disclosure on Firm Performance. PACIS 2023 Proceedings, 2023, p. 188.
  5. Dyer J. S. Maut — Multiattribute Utility Theory. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. New York, Springer-Verlag, 2023, vol. 78, pp. 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5_7
  6. ESG Transparency and Sustainability Management Methodology. Frankfut am Main, RAEX, 2022, 11 p.
  7. Hua Yu, Yang J. A Direct LDA Algorithm for High-Dimensional Data — with Application to Face Recognition. Pattern Recognition, 2001, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 2067–2070. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(00)00162-X
  8. Keith S., Kegelmeyer Ph., Andrzejewski D., Buttler D. Exploring Topic Coherence over Many Models and Many Topics. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, 2012, pp. 952–961.
  9. Li Ch., Lipei Zh., Jun Hu., Helu X., Zhongbao Zh. Social Responsibility Portfolio Optimization Incorporating ESG Criteria. Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2021, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2021.02.005
  10. Marcelo G.-B., Espinosa-Leal L. Natural Language Processing Methods for Scoring Sustainability Reports—A Study of Nordic Listed Companies. Sustainability, 2022, vol. 14, no. 15. pp. 9165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159165
  11. Natraj R., Bang G., Nourbakhsh A. Mapping ESG Trends by Distant Supervision of Neural Language Models. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 2020, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 453–68. https://doi.org/10.3390/make2040025
  12. Ning Zh., Zhang Yu., Zong Zh. Fund ESG Performance and Downside Risk: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2023, vol. 86, p. 102526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102526
  13. Schimanski T., Reding A., Reding N., Bingler Ju., Kraus M., Leippold M. Bridging the Gap in ESG Measurement: Using NLP to Quantify Environmental, Social, and Governance Communication. Finance Research Letters, 2024, vol. 61, pp. 104979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.104979
  14. Souza P.V.S. , Dalcero K., Demarche D., Ferreira M., Paulo E. The Impact of Environmental Innovation and National Culture on ESG Practices: A Study of Latin American Companies. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Administracion, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-11-2023-0187
  15. Sirimon T., Suttipun M. The Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting on Corporate Profitability: Evidence from Thailand. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 2024, no. 61, pp. 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2023-0555
  16. Takuya K., Nozaki M. A Text Mining Model to Evaluate Firms’ ESG Activities: An Application for Japanese Firms. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 2020, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10690-020-09309-1
  17. Tremblay M. Ch., Parra C., Castellanos A. Analyzing Corporate Social Responsibility Reports Using Unsupervised and Supervised Text Data Mining. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2015, vol. 9073, pp. 439–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_36
  18. Who Cares Wins (Connecting Financial Marketsto a Changing World). NewYork, United Nations Publ., 2004, 41 p.

Full text (russian)