рус eng
«THE BULLETIN OF IRKUTSK STATE UNIVERSITY». SERIES «MATHEMATICS»
«IZVESTIYA IRKUTSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA». SERIYA «MATEMATIKA»
ISSN 1997-7670 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8785 (Online)

List of issues > Series «Mathematics». 2022. Vol 40

Low-Code and Object Spreadsheet

Author(s)
Daria E. Gavrilina,1, Andrei V. Mantsivoda1

1Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russian Federation

Abstract
The paper considers low-code application development technology based on the idea of object-oriented programming (OOP) visualization. As the core, we use a version of OOP developed by us, which supports managing object models as microservices. The paper considers visual tools for managing object models as the basis for low-code development. An approach to visualization based on the so-called object spreadsheets is proposed. The spreadsheet methodology for object structure management, its implementation within the Ontobox platform, as well as the results of testing this interface to object models are discussed
About the Authors

Daria E. Gavrilina, Postgraduate, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation

Andrei V. Mantsivoda, Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Prof., Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, 664003, Russian Federation

For citation
Gavrilina D. E., Mantsivoda A. V. Low-Code and Object Spreadsheet. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, 2022, vol. 40, pp. 93–103. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2022.40.93
Keywords
low-code, object sreadsheet, microservice object-oriented programming, Ontobox
UDC
004.5
MSC
68U35, 68N15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2022.40.93
References

1. Malykh A.A., Mantsivoda A.V. Document Models. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State university. Series Mathematics, 2017, vol. 21, pp. 89-107. https://doi.org/10.26516/1997-7670.2017.21.89 (in Russian)

2. Appian, a Low-Code Platform and Solutions. URL: https://appian.com/ (accessed 1 April 2022).

3. Arul S. IT Professionals and DevOps Say No to Low-Code // AIM. January 2022. URL: https://analyticsindiamag.com/it-professionals-and-devops-say-no-tolow-code/ (accessed 1 April 2022).

4. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Version 2.0. URL: https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/PDF (accessed 1 April 2022).

5. Gartner Review: Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Low-Code Application Platforms. 20 Sep 2021. URL: https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-27I04ZJT&ct=210921&st=sb (accessed 1 April 2022).

6. Malykh A., Mantsivoda A. Query Language for Logic Architectures // Proceedings of 7th International Conference «Perspectives of System Informatics». Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5947, Springer-Verlag, 2010. P. 294–305.

7. Martin J., Gupta S., Kumar A. Scaling with Low Code to Accelerate Digital Transformation. HFS Research & Infosys. Published November 2021. URL: https://www.infosys.com/services/digital-process-automation/insights/scalinglow-code.html (accessed 1 April 2022).

8. McCormick P. Excel Never Dies. The Spreadsheet That Launched A Million Companies. Not Boring, March 2021. URL: https://www.notboring.co/p/excelnever-dies?s=r (accessed 1 April 2022).

9. OutSystems Low-Code Development Platform. URL: https://www.outsystems.com/ (accessed 1 April 2022).

10. Wolff E. Microservices: Flexible Software Architecture. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2016. 432 p.

11. Wayner P. Why Developers Hate Low-Code. 9 Reasons Programmers Grow Frustrated with the Tools That are Supposed to Save Them Time // InfoWorld. 2019. Sep. 16. URL: https://www.infoworld.com/article/3438819/why-developershate-low-code.html (accessed 1 April 2022).


Full text (russian)